Grammar
Source Link
SQB
  • 4.9k
  • 8
  • 11

It looks like a lot of people here vote questionon questions not basingbased on the question formulation itself, but basingbased on the answers, which that are given to the question. That means they do not vote until they see the answers, then they start to vote.

It isIs this correct?

If yes - how is this behaviour is justified?

What I would think - question is estimated on the formulation itself - how clear is it? does it shows research effort? (These are the criterions you see when you put mouse over voting-arrows). Otherwise how would user, who ask (and who doesn't know the answer) can estimate what is good question and what is not?

It looks like a lot of people here vote question not basing on the question formulation itself, but basing on answers, which are given to the question. That means they do not vote until they see the answers, then they start to vote.

It is correct?

If yes - how this behaviour is justified?

What I would think - question is estimated on the formulation itself - how clear is it? does it shows research effort? (These are the criterions you see when you put mouse over voting-arrows). Otherwise how would user, who ask (and who doesn't know the answer) can estimate what is good question and what is not?

It looks like a lot of people here vote on questions not based on the question formulation itself, but based on the answers that are given. That means they do not vote until they see the answers, then they vote.

Is this correct?

If yes - how is this behaviour justified?

What I would think - question is estimated on the formulation itself - how clear is it? does it shows research effort? (These are the criterions you see when you put mouse over voting-arrows). Otherwise how would user, who ask (and who doesn't know the answer) can estimate what is good question and what is not?

Source Link
klm123
  • 15.7k
  • 7
  • 13

Is it appropriate to vote questions basing on their answers?

It looks like a lot of people here vote question not basing on the question formulation itself, but basing on answers, which are given to the question. That means they do not vote until they see the answers, then they start to vote.

It is correct?

If yes - how this behaviour is justified?

What I would think - question is estimated on the formulation itself - how clear is it? does it shows research effort? (These are the criterions you see when you put mouse over voting-arrows). Otherwise how would user, who ask (and who doesn't know the answer) can estimate what is good question and what is not?