I have tried and failed to find an answer to this is Meta or the help topics. If someone can point me to something I missed, I will happily close this question. I've taken a look at the help page on deleted answers, the community-curated FAQ concerning the same, and the help page on flags.
There is a clear and easy method for flagging questions as duplicates. There is not, however, a clear method for marking answers as duplicates that may need deletion. As an example, this answer has exactly the same solution as the accepted answer. It was posted about 15 hours after the accepted answer. I commented and downvoted.
Is the downvote sufficient because it'll push it towards a review queue or should I be specifically flagging it as well?
Geobits pointed out a similar question on $\mathrm{Meta}^2$ (How to flag duplicate answers?) and it answers how to flag but not should we flag.
After further investigating on Meta.SE, I have found the following relevant posts:
Flag Answer, duplicate
How should one respond to "duplicate answer" flags?
Duplicate Answer Flag
option in "flag" popup for "duplicate answer"
I have come to the following conclusions:
- The problem of duplicate answers is more prominent on Puzzling because a valid answer may be extremely short
- ... and because we may have a high rate of new users that saw a puzzle posted on Facebook (or Friendster, MySpace, LiveJournal, etc.) and don't understand the community guidelines
- ... and because most answers are in spoilers so it's quite possible that users are required to be a bit more studious to avoid posting duplicates
- There appears to be a system-generated flag for duplicate answers and a review queue is available to moderators (Could a mod confirm this?)
- Sending duplicate answers to moderators would increase their workload without adding much value for the site
My tentative decision is to downvote and comment on such answers. If they improve and I am alerted to that (I.E., if they reply to my comment), then I'll remove the downvote and potentially upvote if they can really contribute.
Does anyone have some insights that I missed?