3
$\begingroup$

A number of Rebus puzzles, lately, have found it necessary to state something akin to:

See Also: [tag:Rebus]

Some samples:

A numerical rebus
A puzzling rebus puzzle
The recursive reflection of this rebus may be too revealing

This links to the exact same place that clicking on the Rebus tag, itself, would link to. Is there some reason, that I'm missing, for this, or can we remove it from the posts, and stop doing it? It's just clutter, in my opinion. There have been also quite a few that simply state to See Also, with a link to the Rebus Wikipedia page.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you - I was wondering what this was all about myself. $\endgroup$ – question_asker Mar 28 '16 at 17:02
  • $\begingroup$ It's actually still happening $\endgroup$ – Raystafarian Apr 6 '16 at 11:28
6
$\begingroup$

You're right, it's redundant to repeat the tag twice; not sure what purpose that would serve. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I've edited it out from the links you've given; feel free to edit any other instances out whenever you see them.

$\endgroup$
4

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .