The site's highest rep-holder Rand al'Thor claims that he has a well-formatted, bulleted list that contains information which apparently shows that some users were engaged in sock-puppetry.
Of course, such a claim would need to be verified. And if it is true, then it has far-reaching effects on the site.
I also realise that this could lead to the demonising of a specific user which, again, shouldn't really happen. Rand's defence for this is that he feels that people ought to know the reality before they start voting on the post.
I agree with Rand's defence. But again, the fact that this leads to a single user being targeted feels wrong. Thus, a discussion by the members of the community on whether the "evidence" should be posted is required. And then we could decide on the issue.
Should such an "evidence" of wrong-doing by a few users be posted on meta?