21
votes
How do we move past the absence of our top contributor?
How do we move past rand's suspension? It's simple, really. Ladies and gentlemen, it's time we make room for the new king of Puzzling.SE: Bailey M.
Please, hold your applause.
[End unofficial block....
- 16.9k
15
votes
How do we move past the absence of our top contributor?
Losing the top user on a site is, unfortunately, not unprecedented. Whether because of death or life circumstances (I'm pleased to see I'm no longer the top user on Hermeneutics) or for reasons ...
- 539
6
votes
Should we have a new delete reason for posts removed due to a ban-evasion?
Just so that people can vote on the issue:
Yes.
It would be much more clear to other users if a mod/bot could unambiguously state that a post was closed for violating a suspension, rather than having ...
- 24.1k
1
vote
Should we have a new delete reason for posts removed due to a ban-evasion?
This is a comment that was too long to be one:
You have a valid point point. Very valid. But is it really that important to draw attention to these people after they've been pushed aside? Isn't ...
- 9,301
1
vote
How do we move past the absence of our top contributor?
Just a thought, if I'm keying into the user-in-question's humour correctly, then I think the U.I.Q. has likely already moved on/gotten over it and will be back in a year. The focus of the site is on ...
- 516
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible