Timeline for The benefit of the doubt: should we shift the way we talk about puzzle quality?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 16, 2017 at 16:42 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.puzzling.stackexchange.com/ with https://puzzling.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| S Mar 16, 2017 at 16:42 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.puzzling.stackexchange.com/ with https://puzzling.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 9, 2016 at 16:12 | comment | added | user20 | Oh! Oh, jeez, that's a lot of questions. Maybe a review queue would be better for that sort of thing, but it'd take a lot of people reviewing... hm. | |
| Aug 9, 2016 at 16:08 | comment | added | BmyGuest | Hm, I didn't think that there should be a pre-selection. All ("complete") puzzles of a timer period should receive the tag and the re-evaluation. | |
| Aug 9, 2016 at 15:59 | comment | added | user20 | I like this in spirit, but it worries me, because I think it might turn into a lynch-mob-esque area where people would only post questions they think should have been downvoted, so that everyone can dogpile downvote them. | |
| Aug 4, 2016 at 15:45 | history | answered | BmyGuest | CC BY-SA 3.0 |