Skip to main content
Puzzling

Return to Answer

added 12 characters in body
Source Link
h34
h34
  • 4.6k
  • 9
  • 7

Whoever looks at either the pieces or the squares on a chess board and is triggered to thinking about ethnicity ought not to be. That includes those who post questions to Q&A websites. Meanwhile, trivialisation or mockery of real and very serious social issues, such as racism, or of those who recognise the reality and seriousness of such issues, should be strongly deprecated. That certainly includes when it is done in a "Your inference does not prove that I made any such implication"the implication you are alleging" gaslighty Roger Stone-like way.

Whoever looks at either the pieces or the squares on a chess board and is triggered to thinking about ethnicity ought not to be. That includes those who post questions to Q&A websites. Meanwhile, trivialisation or mockery of real and very serious social issues, such as racism, or of those who recognise the reality and seriousness of such issues, should be strongly deprecated. That certainly includes when it is done in a "Your inference does not prove that I made any such implication" gaslighty Roger Stone-like way.

Whoever looks at either the pieces or the squares on a chess board and is triggered to thinking about ethnicity ought not to be. That includes those who post questions to Q&A websites. Meanwhile, trivialisation or mockery of real and very serious social issues, such as racism, or of those who recognise the reality and seriousness of such issues, should be strongly deprecated. That certainly includes when it is done in a "Your inference does not prove that I made the implication you are alleging" gaslighty Roger Stone-like way.

added 18 characters in body
Source Link
h34
h34
  • 4.6k
  • 9
  • 7

Whoever looks at either the pieces or the squares on a chess board and is triggered to thinking about ethnicity ought not to be. That includes those who post questions to Q&A websites. Meanwhile, trivialisation or mockery of real and very serious social issues, such as racism, or of those who recognise the reality and seriousness of such issues, should be strongly deprecated. That certainly includes when it is done in a "Your inference does not prove mythat I made any such implication" gaslighty Roger Stone-like way.

Whoever looks at either the pieces or the squares on a chess board and is triggered to thinking about ethnicity ought not to be. That includes those who post questions to Q&A websites. Meanwhile, trivialisation or mockery of real and very serious social issues, such as racism, or of those who recognise the reality and seriousness of such issues, should be strongly deprecated. That certainly includes when it is done in a "Your inference does not prove my implication" gaslighty Roger Stone-like way.

Whoever looks at either the pieces or the squares on a chess board and is triggered to thinking about ethnicity ought not to be. That includes those who post questions to Q&A websites. Meanwhile, trivialisation or mockery of real and very serious social issues, such as racism, or of those who recognise the reality and seriousness of such issues, should be strongly deprecated. That certainly includes when it is done in a "Your inference does not prove that I made any such implication" gaslighty Roger Stone-like way.

Source Link
h34
h34
  • 4.6k
  • 9
  • 7

Whoever looks at either the pieces or the squares on a chess board and is triggered to thinking about ethnicity ought not to be. That includes those who post questions to Q&A websites. Meanwhile, trivialisation or mockery of real and very serious social issues, such as racism, or of those who recognise the reality and seriousness of such issues, should be strongly deprecated. That certainly includes when it is done in a "Your inference does not prove my implication" gaslighty Roger Stone-like way.