Timeline for Challenge questions and post quality: How should we proceed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://puzzling.stackexchange.com/ with https://puzzling.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 10, 2014 at 21:44 | comment | added | BmyGuest | Can we make this a "featured" tagged post? | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 21:37 | answer | added | BmyGuest | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 21:31 | answer | added | BmyGuest | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 21:27 | answer | added | BmyGuest | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 9:22 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | @Emrakul, thanks. That explains why I couldn't find it. (If so, then it's a factual error, and should be changed to "some of us". I and others said it was a bad idea from the start). | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 9:12 | comment | added | user20 | @Peter The source of that analogy was me, in a moderator chatroom. (I believe the 'we' refers to the Code Golf community as a whole.) | |
| Dec 9, 2014 at 15:59 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | Do you have a reference for "an interesting analogy was brought up in the discussion: lateral-thinking et. al. is to Puzzling as code-trolling is (was) to PPCG"? I'm wondering whether you're half-remembering a comment I made on the PPCG chat three weeks ago or whether it's in reference to something else. (And who's the "we" in "we originally thought it was a good idea"?) | |
| Dec 8, 2014 at 15:08 | comment | added | Travis Don Kindred | @Doorknob冰 I agree. I simply feel that a user who has only posted horrible questions is likely to do so in the future without correction. Likewise, a great user that posts a seemingly horrid puzzle may actually be posting a great one that's hard to see. A question should absolutely be judged on its own merits, but the user's history should be taken into account before punitive action is taken. That is not to say that a good user's bad puzzle should be unchanged or a bad user's great puzzle removed. | |
| Dec 8, 2014 at 14:48 | comment | added | Doorknob Mod | @TravisKindred Please don't do that. Posts should be voted on (and moderated) by their own quality, not by the user. | |
| Dec 8, 2014 at 14:11 | comment | added | Travis Don Kindred | How do we know if a question is a good one before it has been answered? We look at the other questions by the user. People are fairly consistent in their quality most of the time. For new users, either add additional rules in place that only apply till a user's first well received question or be lenient till we know if they're any good. | |
| Dec 7, 2014 at 13:37 | history | edited | d'alar'cop | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2014 at 12:37 | answer | added | A E | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 12:13 | comment | added | Avigrail | I'd also recommend defining content guidelines for both headline and preface. Just to make clear. | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 11:23 | comment | added | Avigrail | So how can we deal with catch phrases in the future? Will they be shut down at any case or is there a way to combine? Like you did with the serial killer. | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 11:02 | answer | added | Victor Stafusa | timeline score: 12 | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 7:51 | history | edited | d'alar'cop | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 6, 2014 at 5:31 | comment | added | xnor | I want to point out that making your question title descriptive doesn't stop you from including a thematic title in the question body or something like "Rolling Stones: A visual code hidden in an album cover". | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 4:19 | history | asked | DoorknobMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |